Decision Making Basics /
рдирд┐рд░реНрдгрдп рд▓реЗрдиреЗ рдХреА рдореВрд▓ рдмрд╛рддреЗрдВ
Q77
2012,
Decision Making Basics
You are the chairperson of a state sports committee. You have received a complaint and later it was found that an athlete in the junior age category who has won a medal has crossed the age criteria by 5 days. You would.
Correct Answer: b: Ask the athlete to return the medal. тЧП Understanding the Issue: The complaint indicates that the athlete has exceeded the age limit for the junior category by 5 days. This is a clear violation of the age criteria set for the competition.
тЧП Importance of Rules: Sports competitions have strict rules and regulations, including age criteria, to ensure fair play and equal opportunity for all participants. Allowing exceptions could undermine the integrity of the competition.
тЧП Option Analysis:
тЧЛ *(a) Ask the screening committee for a clarification*: While it is important to understand how the oversight occurred, the primary issue is the violation of the age criteria, which needs immediate rectification. тЧЛ *(b) Ask the athlete to return the medal*: This option directly addresses the violation by ensuring that the rules are upheld. The athlete, having competed in the wrong category, should not retain the medal. тЧЛ *(c) Ask the athlete to get an affidavit from the court declaring his/her age*: This is unnecessary as the age discrepancy has already been identified. An affidavit would not change the fact that the athlete is overage. тЧЛ *(d) Ask the members of the sports committee for their views*: While consulting the committee can be beneficial, the clear violation of rules requires decisive action rather than prolonged deliberation. тЧП Conclusion: Given the clear breach of the age criteria, the most appropriate action is to ask the athlete to return the medal, thereby maintaining the integrity of the competition and ensuring fairness for all participants.